|
|
Post by ♪ *~ Lola ~* ♪ on Jul 26, 2012 4:43:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Cybrus on Jul 26, 2012 4:44:15 GMT -5
Why not go to Walgreens or Walmart for even better quality prints?
|
|
|
|
Post by Abyssinian on Jul 26, 2012 4:44:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ♪ *~ Lola ~* ♪ on Jul 26, 2012 4:44:36 GMT -5
What makes you think they'll be better?
Also...I like being able to print them myself.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cybrus on Jul 26, 2012 4:44:54 GMT -5
do you still have printed albums?
Mine have been digital for years now
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. White on Jul 26, 2012 4:45:05 GMT -5
How much do you spend in ink a month?
|
|
|
|
Post by Balto Bob on Jul 26, 2012 4:45:27 GMT -5
I'm positive the machine that costs tens of thousands will print a better picture than your $500 consumer model.
|
|
|
|
Post by ♪ *~ Lola ~* ♪ on Jul 26, 2012 4:45:36 GMT -5
Is it a difference you would notice?
|
|
|
|
Post by aur0rafungirl84 on Jul 26, 2012 4:45:45 GMT -5
we had meh results with our latest epson.
our old 700 served us well though
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Tuxedo on Jul 26, 2012 4:45:56 GMT -5
The better question is, is the convenience of doing it yourself worth the upfront cost of a $500 machine + ink + paper? That buys you a lot of prints at Walgreens.
|
|
|
|
Post by ♪ *~ Lola ~* ♪ on Jul 26, 2012 4:46:15 GMT -5
Without question.
I would much rather do it at home.
|
|
|
|
Post by steven kozlowski on Jul 26, 2012 6:10:49 GMT -5
Reminds me that I need a new photoprinter myself.
|
|
|
|
Post by George WB on Jul 26, 2012 7:00:15 GMT -5
The one you picked is fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oval on Jul 26, 2012 9:19:46 GMT -5
I think it'll be cheaper at a store.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sweet Dreams Are Made of These on Jul 26, 2012 10:37:55 GMT -5
It's nice, but seems pricey
|
|
