|
|
Post by George WB on Jul 10, 2010 19:29:36 GMT -5
What if you end up in the position where there could be a guarantee that a CURE will be found within 10 years for any disease you choose (this could mean a cure form mom's breast cancer, dad's thyroid disease etc)...however no progress will be made on any other disease during this time.
Would you target one disease and find a cure? Why or why not?
|
|
|
|
Post by Biased on Jul 10, 2010 20:35:36 GMT -5
That still doesnt promise that my relative will be cured.. what if my breast cancerous mom died in 3 years and the cure came out 4 years later?
That's not a good deal at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by A Dream Is A Wish (Old) on Jul 10, 2010 21:59:34 GMT -5
I'm not close to anyone with a disease, but I'd agree to it and get a cure for AIDs. Seriously, that disease seems impossible to cure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Apricky on Jul 11, 2010 6:59:25 GMT -5
If I wanted to pick cancer, would it be ALL cancers or just one type?
|
|
|
|
Post by Parched on Jul 11, 2010 21:24:58 GMT -5
I think I'd rather have progress in all rather than just a cure in one, and no progress in the rest.
|
|
