|
Post by Lady Rachel on Feb 19, 2007 13:56:33 GMT -5
Darc-- shut it.
we're nominating members of the month for march... biased is the member of the month for February, and who ever gets nominated out of this thread will be member of the month for march.
just shut it.. that's how it is. : )
|
|
|
Post by darckonquest on Feb 19, 2007 19:03:18 GMT -5
Just so long as everyone takes note that it doesn't make any sense whatsoever.... -darc
|
|
|
Post by Lady Rachel on Feb 20, 2007 11:21:45 GMT -5
sure it does.
why would we nominate someone for motm for a month that has already passed?
anyways-- enough of this.
continue nominating.
|
|
|
Post by darckonquest on Feb 20, 2007 11:41:30 GMT -5
sure it does. why would we nominate someone for motm for a month that has already passed? anyways-- enough of this. continue nominating. Because you're voting for the person that performed with excellence in the previous month. Demo: www.labgc.org/membermonth.htmCriteria: 3. Nominee must have demonstrated a helpful attitude to staff and fellow members during the --->previous month<---- by volunteering to help with Club activities taking on the responsibility of planning and delivering an appropiate Club activity It works the same way in student government, fraternity, GSA, Omega. I'll find more evidence later : ) -darc
|
|
|
Post by Lady Rachel on Feb 20, 2007 16:23:07 GMT -5
i dont care about your evidence. we're not changing it.
|
|
|
Post by Apricky on Feb 20, 2007 22:38:36 GMT -5
what's the point in nominating someone feb member of the month when feb is over? then it's like... okay it's over.. you consider their "service" and let them be member of the next month so they can hold the title
|
|
|
Post by cajunmonkey on Feb 21, 2007 6:46:37 GMT -5
They hold the title for the whole of the next month, but they're the MOTM for hte previous month, coz that's the month where they did whatever that warranted them being MOTM. It's a really simple concept.
|
|
|
Post by Fatal Rewind on Feb 21, 2007 10:15:36 GMT -5
Yeah, after all, "aluminum" is pronounced wrong too, y'all going to go around and start correcting everyone who pronounces it wrong too, along with any grammatical errors or misspellings in forum posts? Just nominate someone, errors in this whole process or not!
|
|
|
Post by ♪ *~ Lola ~* ♪ on Feb 21, 2007 13:16:01 GMT -5
there's no error in the process... it's just the same 2 guys complaining about this who complain about everything else
|
|
|
Post by darckonquest on Feb 21, 2007 13:45:05 GMT -5
there's no error in the process... it's just the same 2 guys complaining about this who complain about everything else That hurts my feelings Lola... -darc
|
|
|
Post by cajunmonkey on Feb 21, 2007 13:52:28 GMT -5
there's no error in the process... it's just the same 2 guys complaining about this who complain about everything else If MLK didn't complain, where would we be?
|
|
|
Post by ♪ *~ Lola ~* ♪ on Feb 21, 2007 14:15:16 GMT -5
but complaining over stuff on a forum is just blah
if it bothers you that much, talk to bboy
|
|
|
Post by Moot on Feb 21, 2007 16:05:06 GMT -5
i vote for TFE
|
|
|
Post by cajunmonkey on Feb 21, 2007 16:43:19 GMT -5
but complaining over stuff on a forum is just blah if it bothers you that much, talk to bboy In all honestly it's not really complaining, it's merely pointing out the error of your ways.
|
|
|
Post by Non-Conquering Wolf on Feb 21, 2007 18:13:13 GMT -5
How is it Lola's fault? Rachel does it this way and I agree with her
|
|