|
|
Post by Stumpzzz on Nov 3, 2014 7:05:19 GMT -5
Don't seem to be all that different. i actually prefer the "after" look and feel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim05 on Nov 3, 2014 9:33:56 GMT -5
Give them normal busts next. What?! No way!  |
|
|
|
Post by Sincerity on Nov 3, 2014 13:25:37 GMT -5
Internet says that the average woman is a size 14. Thaat would be overweight. I'm not disagreeing that the average person would be overweight or not necessarily I'm more arguing that looking at those photos the pictures with larger waists don't look overweight or fat in any sense. People these days are so skewed... I think both versions look fine. I dont look at cartoons and want to be a thin princess though.  |
|
|
|
Post by A Dream Is A Wish (Old) on Nov 3, 2014 21:45:31 GMT -5
Okay, you guys are REALLY mixed up, like Kismetics has pointed out. The pictures on the right aren't even "average" people. They're what REAL skinny people look like. Literally, the only way to have waists as tiny as the first pics in real life is to do that fetish stuff where the women wear corsets so tight that eventually their insides squeeze into other parts of their body. Like this: nypost.com/2014/10/27/ny-based-fetish-model-flaunts-tiny-16-inch-waist/The woman who is doing this is literally looking to the waists of cartoon characters as her inspiration. |
|
Pøĸē
Secret Service
I like pie
Posts: 6,665
Reputation: 941
|
Post by Pøĸē on Nov 4, 2014 0:33:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Kis on Nov 4, 2014 0:37:59 GMT -5
That seems both concerning and unhalthy... I would be highly interested to see an xray version...
|
|
Lost in Time
Posts: 0
Reputation:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2014 15:32:45 GMT -5
Why do the altered versions look so much better yet there was hardly any changes?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kis on Nov 4, 2014 16:32:15 GMT -5
Because they look more natural.
|
|
|
|
Post by mynameisfred on Nov 7, 2014 19:28:32 GMT -5
They don't look all that different to me, honestly.
|
|
