|
Post by PunkChic4life22 on Sept 18, 2010 7:35:31 GMT -5
If you agree, hop on.
Beatles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stones
And any other band of that time
|
|
|
Post by Creative on Sept 18, 2010 7:44:27 GMT -5
if that is implying the beatles rock hard, you are mistaken, because they suck. The classic rock genre was taken over when the stones came along, then came led zeppelin, then pink floyd. Others filled in, but did not replace the greats. If you think otherwise, move on.
|
|
|
Post by Sandra on Sept 18, 2010 7:44:50 GMT -5
i seen this blackbird one time and it was singing in the dead of night. it took it's broken wings and learned to fly. it took it's sunken eyes and learned to see.
|
|
|
Post by Rube on Sept 18, 2010 7:45:57 GMT -5
i didnt know they were considered classic rock
|
|
|
Post by Creative on Sept 18, 2010 7:46:22 GMT -5
SADLY, they are considered the originators of it.
|
|
|
Post by Sandra on Sept 18, 2010 7:48:29 GMT -5
i know man! it's crazy! doesn't it make you wanna twist and shout?!
|
|
|
Post by Ignored on Sept 18, 2010 7:48:54 GMT -5
i mean.. not really.. but but i wanna hold yo haaaaaaaaand!!! i wanna hold yo hand!
|
|
|
Post by Creative on Sept 18, 2010 7:49:06 GMT -5
hootie and the blowfish are better
|
|
|
Post by Google Bot on Sept 18, 2010 7:54:15 GMT -5
Floyd > Zepp > Beatles > lots of sh*t > Stones
|
|
|
Post by Sandra on Sept 18, 2010 7:54:25 GMT -5
golden slumbers will soon fill my eyes... just sayin
|
|
|
Post by Rube on Sept 18, 2010 7:54:34 GMT -5
the were pop
|
|
|
Post by Ignored on Sept 18, 2010 7:54:48 GMT -5
Stones: 50 albums, 4 good songs
|
|
|
Post by Anabelle on Sept 18, 2010 7:55:10 GMT -5
Lots of hate this morning
|
|
|
Post by Google Bot on Sept 18, 2010 7:55:39 GMT -5
are you guys trying to say that the stones originated classic rock?
|
|
|
Post by Sandra on Sept 18, 2010 7:56:23 GMT -5
more than the beatles did.
|
|