|
|
Post by Ryanizme on Apr 2, 2010 23:09:17 GMT -5
::contributes something better::  |
|
|
|
Post by Potter on Apr 3, 2010 2:38:01 GMT -5
we could just lock threads when they get about 3 weeks old.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eclipsed830 on Apr 3, 2010 9:29:40 GMT -5
^Bet our admin is too lazy to lock every old thread lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Ryanizme on Apr 3, 2010 14:11:59 GMT -5
I rarely see this occur. Some members can't come on but once a week and like to catch up.
|
|
|
|
Post by HansonCutter97 on Apr 18, 2010 7:19:31 GMT -5
I have always wondered why it was bad too, I mean sometimes people miss topics and then they want to join in and I think it isn't bad to bump old topics.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elijah on Apr 18, 2010 8:30:30 GMT -5
^yeah but when everyone else finished the conversation, they dont want to see it at the top 2 weeks later
|
|
|
|
Post by darckonquest on Apr 28, 2010 22:53:29 GMT -5
^yeah but when everyone else finished the conversation, they dont want to see it at the top 2 weeks later I find this humorous that the post you replied to was made 2 weeks after the post before it... I presume this was your intention and in that I applaud you. Also :  -darc |
|
